where to buy timberland boots FISA court knew of Dossier
A central pillar of Rep. Devin Nunes memo alleging wrongdoing by the FBI that the government did not disclose the political bias of a source when seeking a surveillance warrant is unfounded, House Intelligence Committee ranking member Adam Schiff told reporters Friday.
But the memo alleges that those motivations were not included in the FISA application, and that senior Justice Department officials knew about Steele anti Trump bias.
Schiff disputed the memo assertion as accurate, saying the court was aware that there was a political motivation behind the Steele dossier. The California Democrat also said it is normal in FISA applications not to name individuals who may be sources of information.
The Washington Post, New York Times and Wall Street Journal reported after the memo release that the FISA court was aware of political motivations behind the dossier.
According to an official cited in the Post on Friday, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter sensitivity, the Justice Department presented disclosure of relevant, material facts, to the FISA court, including that research was being paid for by a political entity. New York Times also reported Friday that the FISA court was told about political motivations behind the dossier. A Democratic memo written to rebut the allegations in Nunes document said the FBI did, in fact, tell the court that the information in the Steele dossier was politically motivated, even if the bureau didn mention that research that went into the dossier was paid for by Democrats, the Times reported, citing two people familiar with the Democratic memo.
The Wall Street Journal further reported that, according to a person familiar with the matter, the FISA application disclosed that Steele was paid by a law firm working for a major political party,
Steve Vladeck, a CNN legal analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law, tweeted Saturday that the news reports served as that the mehmo deliberately misrepresented the record to make the FISA application look shadier than it was and called the revelations to the memo entire premise. don find these reports at all surprising, because it would been the responsible thing for the government to say, especially if, as appears to be the case, there was a lot of additional evidence not derived from the dossier that was part of the underlying application, Vladeck later said in an email. all just further undermines not just the specific conclusions of the Nunes memo, but the larger point it being invoked by the President and his supporters to make. Nunes memo the most explicit Republican effort yet to discredit the FBI investigation into Trump and Russia has drawn criticism from Democrats as well as some Republicans, who say it is politically motivated, and also from the FBI, which warned it omitted key facts that could affect its veracity.
There are currently multiple investigations looking into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, including a probe by the House Intelligence Committee, on which Nunes serves as chairman.
On Saturday morning, Trump tweeted about Nunes memo, saying it vindicates him, and called the Russia investigation American disgrace! memo totally vindicates in probe, Trump wrote. the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on. Their was no Collusion and there was no Obstruction (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead).